Henderson v. Henderson
Henderson v. Henderson
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.
See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R.App.P.; and Glenn v. Glenn, 626 So.2d 638 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993).
Concurring Opinion
concurring specially.
Although I concur in the majority’s affir-mance of the trial court’s judgment, I cannot agree that this case should be affirmed without an opinion, because it presents an issue of first impression. Under Rule 53, Ala. R.App.P., this court may affirm a trial court’s judgment without an opinion; however, that rule requires that before doing so, this court must determine that an “opinion in the case would serve no significant precedential purpose.” Because this
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.