Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, 2000

Henderson v. Henderson

Henderson v. Henderson
Alabama Court of Civil Appeals · Decided April 7, 2000 · Robertson, Yates, Monroe, Thompson, Crawley
781 So. 2d 968; 2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 234; 2000 WL 356315 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Henderson v. Henderson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R.App.P.; and Glenn v. Glenn, 626 So.2d 638 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993).

ROBERTSON, P. J., and YATES, MONROE, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. CRAWLEY, J., concurs specially.

Concurring Opinion

CRAWLEY, Judge,

concurring specially.

Although I concur in the majority’s affir-mance of the trial court’s judgment, I cannot agree that this case should be affirmed without an opinion, because it presents an issue of first impression. Under Rule 53, Ala. R.App.P., this court may affirm a trial court’s judgment without an opinion; however, that rule requires that before doing so, this court must determine that an “opinion in the case would serve no significant precedential purpose.” Because this *969case involves an issue of first impression, that requirement cannot be satisfied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.