Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, 2000

Middleton v. State

Middleton v. State
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided December 1, 2000 · Baschab, Cobb, Fry, Herself, Long, McMillan
794 So. 2d 1244; 2000 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 202; 2000 WL 1763420 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Middleton v. State

Opinion of the Court

On Application for Rehearing

FRY, Judge.

UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM OF SEPTEMBER 29, 2000, WITHDRAWN; AFFIRMED BY SUBSTITUTED UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM; APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OVERRULED.

McMILLAN, J., concurs; BASCHAB, J., concurs specially; LONG, P.J., joins special concurrence; COBB, J., recuses herself.

Concurring Opinion

BASCHAB, Judge,

concurring specially.

Although I agree with the majority’s memorandum in this case, I feel compelled to write specially to express my concern about the punishment provisions set forth in § 22-27-7, Ala.Code 1975. In this regard, I question whether the Legislature *1245intended for an individual to be subjected to such a seemingly excessive fine; whether it intended for the fine to be imposed for the time of noncompliance or after a court has found that a violation exists; whether it truly intended for a violation to constitute a misdemeanor; what it meant when it referred to a “continuing” violation; and whether, in cases of continuing violations, it intended for each day’s violation to constitute a separate misdemeanor offense. Therefore, I urge the Legislature to reexamine this statute and to make its intent regarding punishment clear.

LONG, P.J., concurs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.