Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, 2001

Henderson v. State

Henderson v. State
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided May 25, 2001 · McMillan, Cobb, Wise, Baschab, Shaw
808 So. 2d 1234; 2001 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 81; 2001 WL 564258 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Henderson v. State

Concurring Opinion

SHAW, Judge,

concurring in the result.

I adhere to the views I expressed in my special writing in Casey v. State, [Ms. CR-98-1661, March 16, 2001] — So.2d - (Ala.Crim.App. 2001); therefore, I disagree with the statement in this Court’s unpublished memorandum quoted from the main opinion in Casey that a full pardon “ ‘is irrelevant for purposes of considering pri- or convictions for sentence enhancement purposes.’ ” Otherwise, I concur.

Opinion of the Court

McMILLAN, Presiding Judge.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

COBB and WISE, JJ, concur. BASCHAB, J, concurs in the result. SHAW, J, concurs in the result, with opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑