Hood v. State
Hood v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.
Concurring in Part
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur to affirm the appellant’s conviction; however, I would reverse his sentence and remand the case for resentenc-ing. See Judge Shaw’s special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, August 31, 2001] — So.2d - (Ala.Crim.App. 2001), with which I concurred as to this issue. As to those points on which I disagree with Judge Shaw, see my special writing in Poole, — So.2d at-.
Concurring in Part
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur to affirm the appellant’s conviction; however, I would reverse his sentence and remand the case for resentenc-ing in accordance with my special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, August 31, 2001] — So.2d - (Ala.Crim.App. 2001) (Shaw, J., concurring in the result).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.