Regino v. State
Regino v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.
Concurring in Part
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur in affirming the appellant’s conviction; however, I would reverse his sentence and remand the case for resentenc-ing in accordance with my special writing concurring in the result in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, August 31, 2001] — So.2d - (Ala.Crim.App. 2001). Therefore, as to the sentencing issue, I dissent.
Concurring in Part
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur to affirm the appellant’s conviction; however, I would reverse his sentence and remand the case for resentenc-ing in accordance with my special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, August 31, 2001] - So.2d - (Ala.Crim.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.