McGhee v. State
McGhee v. State
Concurring in Part
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur in affirming the appellant’s conviction; however, I would reverse his sentence and remand the case for resen-tencing in accordance with Judge Shaw’s special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, August 31, 2001] - So.2d - (Ala.Crim.App. 2001), with which I concurred as to this issue. As to those points on which I disagree with Judge Shaw, see my special -writing in Poole, - So.2d -. I believe that these sentence enhancements must be charged in the indictment and proved to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the failure to do so is a jurisdictional defect which this Court should notice and remedy on appeal. Therefore, as to the sentencing issue, I dissent.
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.