Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, 2001

Merchant v. State

Merchant v. State
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided October 26, 2001 · Baschab, Wise, Shaw, Cobb
819 So. 2d 662; 2001 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 268; 2001 WL 1299144 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Merchant v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

*663McMILLAN, P.J., and BASCHAB and WISE, JJ., concur; SHAW, J., concurs in the result; COBB, J., dissents, with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

COBB, Judge,

dissenting.

I agree with the result the majority reaches in its unpublished memorandum as to all claims except those arising from the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). In accordance with my special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, August 31, 2001] — So.2d -, - (Ala.Crim.App. 2001), I believe that Merchant has presented a valid jurisdictional challenge to the trial court’s authority to impose sentence and may be entitled to relief on this claim. Therefore, I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s affirmance of the denial of Merchant’s Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition because I believe that the circuit court should have granted this petition in order to address the Apprendi claims.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.