Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, 2001

Maull v. State

Maull v. State
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided August 31, 2001 · McMillan, Baschab, Wise, Shaw, Cobb
825 So. 2d 859; 2001 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 133; 2001 WL 996131 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Maull v. State

Opinion of the Court

On Return to Remand

McMILLAN, Presiding Judge.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

BASCHAB and WISE, JJ„ concur. SHAW, J., concurs in the result. COBB, J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with opinion.

Concurring in Part

COBB, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I agree with the majority’s unpublished memorandum except insofar as it affirms the trial judge’s judgment concerning the enhancement provision applied to Maull’s conviction. See Judge Shaw’s special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, August 31, 2001] - So.2d - (Ala.Crim.App. 2001), with which I concurred as to this issue. As to those points on which I disagree with Judge Shaw, see my special writing in Poole, - So.2d at -.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑