Gunter v. State
Gunter v. State
827 So. 2d 883; 2001 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 227; 2001 WL 1148084
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Gunter v. State
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting).
The trial court erred when it permitted the State to amend the indictment to include the enhancement for the use of a firearm found in § 13A-12-231(13), Aa. Code 1975, because the amendment resulted in Gunter’s being charged with a greater offense. See Rule 13.5(a), Aa. R.Crim.P. Therefore, I would reverse the appellant’s conviction and sentence. See my special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, August 31, 2001] — So.2d - (Aa.Crim.App. 2001) (Shaw, J., concurring in the result).
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.