Beardslee v. State
Beardslee v. State
838 So. 2d 1067; 2001 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 218; 2001 WL 1148125
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Beardslee v. State
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
The trial court erred when it permitted the State to amend the indictment to include enhancement under the provisions in §§ 13A-12-250 and 13A-12-270, Ala.Code 1975, because the amendment resulted in Beardslee’s being charged with a greater offense. See Rule 13.5(a), Ala.R.Crim.P.. Therefore, I would reverse the appellant’s conviction and sentence. See my special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, August 31, 2001] — So.2d - (Ala.Crim.App. 2001) (Shaw, J., concurring in the result).
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.