AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1), (a)(2)(A), and (a)(2)(E), Ala. R.App. P.; Rule 60(b)(6), Ala. R. Civ. P.; Crenshaw v. Crenshaw, 816 So.2d 1046 (Ala.Civ.App. 2001); Watson v. Watson, 696 So.2d 1071 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996); Brannon v. Brannon, 477 So.2d 445 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985); and Hobbs v. Hobbs, 423 So.2d 878 (Ala.Civ.App. 1982).

The appellee’s request for an attorney fee on appeal is denied.

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I agree that the wife is not entitled to retirement benefits in this case. However, I disagree that a subsequent request for periodic alimony after the trial court has reserved the issue of alimony must be based on a material change in circumstances. See my dissent in Crenshaw v. Crenshaw, 816 So.2d 1046 (Ala.Civ.App. 2001).