Sharpless v. Sharpless
Sharpless v. Sharpless
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.
See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(A), Ala. R.App. P.; Ex parte Patronas, 693 So.2d 473 (Ala. 1997); Hughes v. Hughes, 685 So.2d 755 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996); Spry v. Ikerd, 646 So.2d 131 (Ala.Civ.App. 1994); Thompson v. Wright, 613 So.2d 1289 (Ala.Civ.App. 1992); and Haygood v. Haygood, 581 So.2d 870 (Ala.Civ.App. 1991).
The appellee’s request for an attorney fee on appeal is granted in the amount of $500.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
Based upon my review of the evidence in this case, and based upon the manner in which the trial court explained its holding, I am not persuaded that the trial court properly applied what is commonly referred to as the “material promotion” standard recognized in Ex parte McLendon, 455 So.2d 863 (Ala. 1984). I therefore respectfully dissent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.