Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, 2002

King v. State

King v. State
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided September 27, 2002 · Baschab, McMillan, Cobb, Shaw, Wise
853 So. 2d 1045; 2002 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 209; 2002 WL 31151215 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

King v. State

Opinion of the Court

BASCHAB, Judge.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

McMILLAN, P.J., concurs; COBB, J„ concurs in the result, with opinion; SHAW and WISE, JJ., concur in the result.

Concurring Opinion

COBB, Judge,

concurring in the result.

I write specially to point out that I believe Part III addressed in the majority’s unpublished memorandum to be properly preserved for appellate review. Additionally, I do not wish to be characterized as condoning the prosecutor’s actions in Part III. However, after a review of the *1046record, I realize that Marcus Carlice King suffered no prejudice, because the witness testified that the prosecutor’s comments did not in any way change his testimony. Accordingly, I concur only in the result.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑