Boykins v. State
Boykins v. State
Opinion of the Court
In accordance with the holding in Ex parte Boykins, [Ms. 1011152, December 20, 2002]
We note, however, that because the Supreme Court determined that Boykins's petition challenging the denial by the Department of Corrections ("DOC") of his request to earn incentive good time was improperly treated as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, rather than as a petition for a writ of certiorari, the Bullock Circuit Court no longer has jurisdiction to determine the merits of Boykins's petition. A petition for writ of habeas corpus is properly filed in the circuit court nearest to where the petitioner is incarcerated. See §
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
McMILLAN, P.J., and BASCHAB, J., concur. SHAW, J., concurs in the result, with opinion, which COBB, J., joins.
Concurring Opinion
I concur in reversing the judgment of the circuit court and remanding this case with instructions that it be transferred to Montgomery County. However, I express no opinion with respect to the following dicta in the majority opinion:
"Finally, we note that should an appeal be taken from the Montgomery Circuit Court's judgment, the appeal should be filed with the Court of Civil Appeals, because Boykins's case would be an appeal from an administrative agency, see §
12-3-10 , Ala. Code 1975, rather than an appeal from a post-conviction writ in a criminal case."
862 So.2d at 595.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Gregory Boykins v. State of Alabama.
- Cited By
- 16 cases
- Status
- Published