Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, 2003

Lewis v. L.S.E.

Lewis v. L.S.E.
Alabama Court of Civil Appeals · Decided February 14, 2003 · Murdock, Crawley, Thompson, Pittman, Yates
867 So. 2d 347; 2003 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 77; 2003 WL 328850 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Lewis v. L.S.E.

Opinion of the Court

MURDOCK, Judge.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala.R.App. P.; Ex parte State Dep’t of Indus. Relations, 848 So.2d 251 (Ala. 2002); Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., 612 So.2d 409 *348(Ala. 1992); Drummond Company, Inc. v. Boatman, 825 So.2d 823 (Ala.Civ.App. 2001); and Jack’s Restaurant v. Tumbow, 674 So.2d 573 (Ala:Civ.App. 1995).

CRAWLEY, THOMPSON, and PITTMAN, JJ., concur. YATES, P.J., concurs specially.

Concurring Opinion

YATES, Presiding Judge,

concurring specially.

I recognize that the law regarding the rights of surviving spouses and children to workers’ compensation benefits as set forth in Drummond Co. v. Boatman, 825 So.2d 823 (Ala.Civ.App. 2001), and followed by our supreme court in Ex parte State Department of Industrial Relations, 848 So.2d 251 (Ala. 2002), is the current law of this state, which I am bound to follow. However, I still believe that this court erred in Drummond Co. when it overruled Chatham Steel Corp. v. Shadinger, 768 So.2d 969 (Ala.Civ.App. 1999); see my dissent in Drummond Co.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.