Clark v. State
Clark v. State
879 So. 2d 609; 2003 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 142; 2003 WL 21246565
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Clark v. State
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
Because this case is materially indistinguishable from Capps v. State, 747 So.2d 358 (Ala.Crim.App. 1999), and Crenshaw v. State, 740 So.2d 478 (Ala.Crim.App. 1998), I respectfully dissent. Even though the appellant’s sentence fell within the statutory range of punishment for a defendant who has one prior felony conviction, we do not know what prior convictions the trial court considered when it sentenced the appellant. Therefore, we should remand this case for the circuit court to resentence the appellant using only one prior conviction.
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.