Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, 2004

Marshall v. State

Marshall v. State
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided January 30, 2004 · Cobb, McMillan, Baschab, Shaw, Wise
884 So. 2d 907; 2004 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 14; 2004 WL 178588 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Marshall v. State

Opinion of the Court

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

COBB, Judge.

In accordance with the judgment of the Alabama Supreme Court, we dismiss the petitioner’s appeal. The proper vehicle for the petitioner’s claims is a petition for a writ of mandamus, not a petition filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R. Crim. P. See *908Marshall v. State, 884 So.2d 900 (Ala. 2003).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

McMILLAN, P.J., and BASCHAB, SHAW, and WISE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑