Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, 2004

Ray v. State

Ray v. State
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided February 27, 2004 · Baschab, McMillan, Shaw, Wise, Cobb
890 So. 2d 1107; 2004 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 42; 2004 WL 362295 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Ray v. State

Opinion of the Court

BASCHAB, Judge.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

McMILLAN, P.J., and SHAW and ' • WISE, JJ., concur; COBB, J., concurs in the result, with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

COBB, Judge,

'concurring in the result.

I write specially to state that I do not agree with the majority’s holding in its unpublished memorandum that claims II, VI, XIII, XIV, XV, XVI,'and XVII (claims 2, 6, 27,18,19, 20, and 31 in the appellant’s petition) were not sufficiently pleaded pursuant to Rules 32.3 and 32.6(b), Ala. R.Crim. P. However, I concur with the majority’s decision to affirm the summary denial of Melvin Ray’s Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition because those claims are withqut merit or are otherwise precluded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑