Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, 2004

Fort James Operating Company v. Irby

Fort James Operating Company v. Irby
Alabama Court of Civil Appeals · Decided July 30, 2004 · Thompson, Yates, Crawley, Pittman, Murdock
895 So. 2d 298; 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 594; 2004 WL 1699865 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Fort James Operating Company v. Irby

Opinion of the Court

*299 After Remand from the Supreme Comt

THOMPSON, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Fort James Operating Company, 895 So.2d 294 (Ala. 2004). On remand to this court, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed insofar as it denied Fort James a setoff of the workers’ compensation benefits for the sickness- and-accident benefits Fort James paid to Irby and insofar as it awarded “other benefits” to Irby. The cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, PITTMAN, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.