Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, 2004

Hoagland v. State

Hoagland v. State
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided March 26, 2004 · Wise, McMillan, Cobb, Baschab, Shaw
898 So. 2d 906; 2004 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 50; 2004 WL 595291 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hoagland v. State

Opinion of the Court

WISE, Judge.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

McMILLAN, P.J., and COBB, J., concur. BASCHAB, J., concurs in the result. SHAW, J., concurs in the result, with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

SHAW, Judge,

concurring in the result.

I disagree with the Court’s statement in its unpublished memorandum that Wilson v. State, 830 So.2d 765 (Ala.Crim.App.*9072001), was correctly decided under Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 111 S.Ct. 2680, 115 L.Ed.2d 836 (1991). See my special writing in Wilson, 830 So.2d at 787. In all other aspects, I concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑