Green v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
Green v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.
Opinion
Curtis T. Green sued Georgia-Pacific Corporation seeking to recover workers' compensation benefits for an alleged on-the-job injury. On January 16, 2004, the trial court entered a judgment in favor of Georgia-Pacific. Green filed a postjudgment motion on February 13, 2004. See Rule 59(e), Ala. R. Civ. P. (providing that a postjudgment motion may be filed within 30 days of the entry of a final judgment). On June 9, 2004, the trial court purported to enter an order denying Green's February 13, 2004, postjudgment motion. Green filed a notice of appeal on June 25, 2004. However, because we conclude that Green's notice of appeal was untimely filed, we must dismiss this appeal. Rule 2(a)(1), Ala. R.App. P.
A Rule 59 postjudgment motion is deemed to be denied by operation of law if the trial court fails to rule on the motion within 90 days. First Alabama Bank v. McGowan,
In this case, the 90th day after February 13, 2004, the date on which Green filed his postjudgment motion, was May 13, 2004. Although the trial court *Page 963
purported to enter an order denying Green's February 13, 2004, postjudgment motion on June 9, 2004, the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter that order because it was entered more than 90 days after the date Green filed his postjudgment motion. Exparte Caterpillar, Inc., supra; see also Ex parte Hornsby,
"The timely filing of [a] notice of appeal is a jurisdictional act." Rudd v. Rudd,
APPEAL DISMISSED.
CRAWLEY, P.J., and PITTMAN, MURDOCK, and BRYAN, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.