Williams v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.
McMILLAN, P.J., and COBB and WISE, JJ., concur.
BASCHAB, J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with opinion. *Page 343
Concurring Opinion
I concur to affirm the appellant's conviction. However, because the trial court imposed an excessive Demand Reduction Assessment Act fine, see §
In this case, the trial court imposed a $2,000 Demand Reduction Assessment Act fine. Section §
"In addition to any disposition and fine authorized by Sections
13A-12-202 ,13A-12-203 ,13A-12-204 ,13A-12-211 ,13A-12-212 ,13A-12-213 ,13A-12-215 , or13A-12-231 , or any other statute indicating the dispositions that can be ordered for such a conviction or an adjudication of delinquency, every person convicted of, or adjudicated delinquent for, a violation of any offense defined in the sections set forth above, shall be assessed for each such offense an additional penalty fixed at $1,000 for first offenders and $2,000 for second and subsequent offenders."
(Emphasis added.) The record shows that the appellant had a previous drug conviction in the State of Georgia. However, the plain language of §
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.