Pennington v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Pennington v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
4 So. 3d 478; 2007 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 347; 2007 WL 1519042
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Pennington v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I dissent on the basis that Kenneth Howell did not properly intervene in the administrative proceeding pursuant to § 40-2A-9G), Ala.Code 1975.
BRYAN, J., concurs.
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.
See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(E), Ala. R.App. P.; Ala.Code 1975, §§ 40-2A-3(23), 40-2A-8(a), 40-2A-9(g), and 40-2A-9(g)(2); Knight v. Beverly Health Care Bay Manor Health Care Center, 820 So.2d 92, 97 (Ala. 2001); Ikner v. Miller, 477 So.2d 387, 389 (Ala. 1985); and Charles Israel Chevrolet, Inc. v. Walter E. Heller & Co., 476 So.2d 71, 74 (Ala. 1985).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.