Wallace v. State
Wallace v. State
996 So. 2d 850; 2008 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 55; 2008 WL 902881
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Wallace v. State
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
Because the appellant’s argument regarding the improper use of his previous conviction for receiving stolen property may be meritorious, we should remand this case for the circuit court to take evidence and to make specific findings of fact as to this claim. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.