Yaun v. Healey
Yaun v. Healey
110 So. 3d 394; 2012 WL 5374137; 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 303
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Yaun v. Healey
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.
See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R.App. P.; Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., 612 So.2d 409, 410 (Ala. 1992); Robbins v. Payne, 84 So.3d 136, 140 (Ala.Civ.App. 2011); Springer v. Damrich, 993 So.2d 481, 489 (Ala.Civ.App. 2008); Deines v.
Concurring in Part
Presiding Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I dissent as to the amount Kelly Driskell Yaun was ordered to pay toward the attorney fee incurred by Thomas Leo Healey III. Otherwise, I agree that the remainder of the judgment is due to be affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.