Kepner v. State
Kepner v. State
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.
Concurring in Part
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Except as to James Samuel Norton Kepner’s conviction for unlawful possession of child pornography, see § 13A-12-192, Ala.Code 1975, I concur with the Court’s decision to affirm, by unpublished memorandum, Kepner’s convictions. Kep-ner’s conviction for unlawful possession of child pornography was based, in part, on an erroneously admitted report of forensic testing and images retrieved from Kep-ner’s cellular telephone as a result of that forensic testing. I disagree with the Court’s conclusion that this error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt; therefore, I respectfully dissent as to the affirmance of that conviction.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.