Alabama Court of Civil Appeals, 2016

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pritchard

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pritchard
Alabama Court of Civil Appeals · Decided April 22, 2016 · Donaldson, Moore, Pittman, Thomas, Thompson
207 So. 3d 740; 2016 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 97 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pritchard

Opinion of the Court

On Remand, from the Alabama Supreme CouH

PER CURIAM.

This court’s prior judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Alabama Supreme Court. Ex parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 207 So.3d 734, *741739 (Ala. 2016). In compliance with the supreme court’s opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause with instructions to the trial court to enter a judgment denying the request of James Ross Pritchard, Jr., that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company pay a pro rata share of the attorney fees incurred by Pritchard “for the recovery of moneys advanced by State Farm ... pursuant to Lambert v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 576 So.2d 160 (Ala. 1991).” Ex parte State Farm, 207 So.3d at 735.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN, THOMAS, MOORE, and DONALDSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.