IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION

GREGORY HEARD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No.: 3:19-cv-913-SMD ) ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On April 27, 2020, the Commissioner filed an Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of

(g) with Remand of the Cause to Defendant (Doc. 13) for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of

(g). The Commissioner states that remand is necessary so that the Appeals Council may “instruct the administrative law judge (ALJ) to reevaluate the persuasiveness of the prior administrative finding under

.1520c and 416.920c, including providing specific discussion of the factors of consistency and supportability; reevaluate Plaintiff’s residual functional capacity; as necessary, obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert; and issue a new decision..” (Doc. 13) at 1. Sentence four of

(g) authorizes the district court to “enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.”

(g). The district court may remand a case to the Commissioner for a rehearing if the court finds “either . . . the decision is not supported by substantial evidence, or . . . the Commissioner or the ALJ incorrectly applied the law relevant to the disability claim.” Jackson v. Chater,

(11th Cir. 1996). In this case, the Court finds reversal and remand necessary as Defendant concedes reconsideration and further development of the record is in order. Furthermore, Plaintiff

does not oppose the motion. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four of

(g) with Remand of the Cause to Defendant (Doc. 13) be and hereby is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner be and is

hereby REVERSED and this case be and is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Finally, it is ORDERED that, in accordance with Bergen v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec.,

, 1278 n.2 (11th Cir. 2006), the plaintiff shall have ninety (90) days after she receives notice of any amount of past due benefits awarded to seek attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C.§

406(b). See also Blitch v. Astrue,

, 241 n.1 (11th Cir. 2008). Done this 27th day of April, 2020.

/s/ Stephen M. Doyle UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2