Snodgrass v. Limestone Correctional Facility (INMATE 2)
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION RICHARD SNODGRASS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) Case No.: 5:20-cv-291-LCB-JHE ) LIMESTONE CORRECTIONAL ) FACILITY, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER On May 8, 2020, U.S. Magistrate Judge John H. England, III issued a Report and Recommendation in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. (Doc. 8). Plaintiff has filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation.
When a party objects to a portion of a Magistrate Judge’s report or proposed findings or recommendations, the District Court must conduct a de novo review of those portions of the report to which the party has specifically objected. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court reviews the unchallenged portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report for clear error. See LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 750 (11th Cir. 1988).
Having reviewed the proposed findings and recommendations for clear error, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) should be ACCEPTED and hereby ADOPTS it as the findings of the Court. This action is therefore DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the case.
DONE and ORDERED this June 5, 2020.
Ko SZ Sh LILES C. BURKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.