Roland v. Toney
Roland v. Toney
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION
TERRELL ROLAND, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 3:19-cv-02103-ACA-HNJ ) TONEY, Warden, et al., ) ) Respondents. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an action for a writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner Terrell Roland, pro se, on or about December 26, 2019. (Docs. 1, 5). Mr. Roland challenges his 2008 convictions for murder and second degree assault in the Circuit Court of Colbert County, Alabama. (Id.). On May 11, 2020, the magistrate judge to whom the case was referred entered a report and recommendation pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that habeas relief be denied. (Doc. 15). The magistrate judge notified Mr. Roland of his right to file objections to the report and recommendation within fourteen (14) days. (Id.). Rather than file objections, Mr. Roland re-dated and re-filed his response to respondents’ answer, which the Clerk docketed as objections. (Doc. 16). Even so construed, nothing in the petitioner’s response provides a basis to toll the statutory time limitations for filing a habeas petition. Thus, the petition 1s due to be dismissed
as time-barred. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge’s findings are due to be and are hereby ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is due to be DENIED and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Further, because the petition does not present issues that are debatable among jurists of reason, a certificate of appealability is also due to be DENIED. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484-85(2000); Rule 11(a), Rules Governing § 2254 Proceedings. A separate Final Order will be entered. DONE and ORDERED this June 17, 2020. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown