MD v. Barr

United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

MD v. Barr

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION

FARHAD MD, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) V. ) Case No.: 4:20-cv-451-LCB-GMB ) WILLIAM BARR, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER On July 15, 2020, U.S. Magistrate Judge Gray M. Borden issued a Report and Recommendation in accordance with

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) recommending that Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) be granted and the petition be dismissed as moot. (Doc. 11). Petitioner has not objected to the Report and Recommendation. When a party objects to a portion of a Magistrate Judge’s report or proposed findings or recommendations, the District Court must conduct a de novo review of those portions of the report to which the party has specifically objected.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). The unchallenged portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report are reviewed for clear error. See LoConte v. Dugger,

847 F.2d 745, 750

(11th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the proposed findings and recommendations for clear error, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) should be ACCEPTED and hereby ADOPTS it as the findings of the Court. This action is therefore DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the case. DONE and ORDERED this September 2, 2020. LA EE c LILES C. BURKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown