Reyes v. Wolf
Reyes v. Wolf
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION
JOSE ALFREDO REYES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) Case No.: 4:20-cv-524-LCB-JHE ) CHAD F. WOLF, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER Petitioner Alfredo Reyes, a detainee at the Etowah County Detention Center in Gadsden, Alabama, has petitioned the Court under
28 U.S.C. § 2241for a writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 1). On August 21, 2020, U.S. Magistrate Judge John H. England, III issued a Report and Recommendation in accordance with
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) recommending that the Court deny Reyes’s petition as premature and dismiss the action without prejudice. (Doc. 12). No party has objected to the Report and Recommendation. When a party objects to a portion of a Magistrate Judge’s report or proposed findings or recommendations, the District Court must conduct a de novo review of those portions of the report to which the party has specifically objected.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The unchallenged portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report are reviewed for clear error. See LoConte v. Dugger,
847 F.2d 745, 750(11th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the proposed findings and recommendations for clear error, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) should be ACCEPTED and hereby ADOPTS it as the findings of the Court. Reyes’s Petition (Doc. 1) is DENIED, and the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DONE and ORDERED this October 8, 2020.
i SZ C Sha LILES C. BURKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown