UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL NATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:19-cv-0378-LSC-JHE ) DOUG FARRIS, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION The magistrate judge filed a report on September 14, 2020, recommending this action be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and for seeking monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). (Doc. 13). The plaintiff has filed objections to the report and recommendation. (Doc. 14). The plaintiff argues that judicial immunity does not apply in his case because he “only seeks injunctive & declaratory relief from the Defendants (Selman & Farris) in the form of Ordering Keith Nation to reimburse Plaintiff his SSI funds.” (Doc. 14 at 1). Moreover, the plaintiff asserts that Judge Selman and Judge Farris ordered his funds to be garnished without due process. (Id. at 3). The cases cited by the plaintiff in his objections are inapplicable to the facts in this case and/or do not support the plaintiff’s argument. (Id. at 2–7). In addition, the magistrate addressed the same arguments the plaintiff makes in his objections at pages 6–7 of the report and recommendation. (See Doc. 13 at 6–7). The court agrees

that the plaintiff has failed to show that he does not have an adequate remedy at law. (Id.). Furthermore, the plaintiff’s argument that the State has waived its sovereign

immunity is without merit. A law “suit against the State [of Alabama] and its [agencies] is barred by the Eleventh Amendment, unless Alabama has consented to the filing of such a suit.” Alabama v. Pugh,

(1978) (citations omitted). No such consent can “be given under Art. I, Sec. 14, of the Alabama

Constitution, which provides that ‘the State of Alabama shall never be made a defendant in any court of law or equity.’”

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the

court file, including the report and recommendation, and the objections thereto, the magistrate judge’s report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), this action is due to be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief

can be granted and for seeking monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such suit. A Final Judgment will be entered. DONE and ORDERED on November 6, 2020.

L. Scott Cc United States District Judge 160704