Duncan v. Toney
Duncan v. Toney
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION JAMES RANDALL DUNCAN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 7:18-cv-1174-LSC-GMB ) WARDEN JIMMY THOMAS, et al., ) ) Respondents. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION The Magistrate Judge entered a report recommending Petitioner James Randall Duncan’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 13). Although the Magistrate Judge advised the parties of their right to file objections within 14 days, the court has not received any objections in the prescribed time. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s report and ACCEPTS his recommendation. The court finds the petition is due to be denied and dismissed with prejudice. This court may issue a certificate of appealability “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). To make such a showing, a “petitioner must demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484(2000), or that “the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller-El vy. Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 336(2003) (internal quotations omitted). The court finds Duncan’s claims do not satisfy either standard. The court will enter a separate Final Judgment. DONE and ORDERED on June 30, 2021. XS
United States District Judge 160704
Reference
- Status
- Unknown