United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, 2022

Jones v. ASK Telemarketing, Inc.

Jones v. ASK Telemarketing, Inc.
United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama · Decided May 2, 2022
Jones v. ASK Telemarketing, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

NATASHA JONES, et al., ) individually and on behalf ) of all other similarly ) situated individuals, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. v. ) 2:22cv20-MHT ) (WO) ASK TELEMARKETING, INC., ) an Alabama Corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Upon review of the report of the parties’ planning meeting (Doc. 31), and in light the two-step process recommended by the Eleventh Circuit in putative collective actions under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), see Morgan v. Fam. Dollar Stores, Inc., 551 F.3d 1233, 1260 (11th Cir. 2008), Hipp v. Liberty Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 252 F.3d 1208, 1218-19 (11th Cir. 2001), Florence v. Deli Mgmt., Inc., No. 1:18-CV-4303-SCJ, 2018 WL 7474860, at *1 (N.D. Ga. Dec. 18, 2018) (Jones, J.) (“Pre-certification discovery in an FLSA action is the exception, not the rule.”), it is ORDERED that: (1) The parties shall submit a new Rule 26(f) report within 10 days after the court’s ruling on plaintiffs’ motion for conditional collective certification and court-authorized notice to potential opt-in plaintiffs (Doc. 26). (2) Discovery will commence after the court’s ruling on plaintiffs’ conditional-certification motion. (3) The deadline for amending the pleadings shall be set after the court’s ruling on plaintiff’s conditional-certification motion. All proposed amendments to the pleadings shall be filed with a motion for leave to amend pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 and Middle District of Alabama Local Rule 15.1.

DONE, this the 2nd day of May, 2022.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.