Cost v. Gentry

United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

Cost v. Gentry

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

JAMES MANELY COST, II, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 5:21-cv-1561-LSC-GMB ) SHERIFF MATT GENTRY, et al., ) ) Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Magistrate Judge entered a report (doc. 8), recommending that the court deny Petitioner James Manely Cost, II’s motion for evidentiary hearing (doc. 4) and dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus without prejudice. The court has not received any objections. After considering the record and the Magistrate Judge’s report, the court ADOPTS the report and ACCEPTS the recommendation. Consistent with that recommendation, the court will DENY the motion for evidentiary hearing (doc. 4) and DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE the petition for writ of habeas corpus. The court will enter a final judgment. This court may issue a certificate of appealability “only if the applicant has a made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). To make such a showing, a “petitioner must demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000), or that “the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller-El vy. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003) (internal quotations omitted). The court finds Cost’s claims do not satisfy either standard. DONE and ORDERED on June 13, 2022. XS

United States District Judge 160704

Reference

Status
Unknown