Aaron v. Ferrell

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

LAKESHIA AARON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. v. ) 2:23cv374-MHT ) (WO) TERESA L. FERRELL a/k/a ) Teresa L. Briggs, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Upon consideration of defendant’s motion to dismiss or in the alternative for a more definite statement (Doc. 18), it is ORDERED that the motion is denied.

The complaint “contain[s] sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 548 (2007)). There is no need for a more definite statement.

DONE, this the 4th day of December, 2023. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE