UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION

LISA CASEY KISER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 7:20-cv-00562-ACA-HNJ ) PATRICIA BRADLEY, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION On May 1, 2023, the magistrate judge entered a report recommending the dismissal of the federal claims in this action for failure to state a claim and dismissal of the state claims based on a declination of supplemental jurisdiction. (Doc. 26). Although the magistrate judge advised Plaintiff Lisa Marie Kiser of her right to file written objections within fourteen days, as well as the consequences of failing to object (id. at 72), the court has not received any objections. Ms. Kiser’s failure to file specific objections waives any challenge to the proposed findings and recommendations. See

(b)(1); 11th Cir. R. 3- 1. The court therefore ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s report and ACCEPTS the recommendation.1 In particular, the court emphasizes the shotgun nature of

1 In making his recommendation, the magistrate judge considered every filing Ms. Kiser ever submitted to the court. (See doc. 26 at 6 n.2). While the court commends the magistrate judge’s thoroughness, the court notes that “[p]ro se Ms. Kiser’s amended complaint, despite having the opportunity to replead once already. (See doc. 26 at 68-71). The court WILL DISMISS Ms. Kiser’s federal claims WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim and WILL DECLINE to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Ms. Kiser’s state law claims. The court will enter a separate final order consistent with this opinion. DONE and ORDERED this May 26, 2023.

ANNEMARIE CARNEY AXON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

litigants . . . are required to conform to procedural rules.” Roy v. Ivy,

, 1346 (11th Cir. 2022). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require a party to assert any claims she is making in her operative pleading. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). Accordingly, even if the reasons given by the magistrate judge for dismissal of the claims asserted in abrogated pleadings or other documents filed with the court were erroneous, the court would have disregarded those claims as improperly pleaded.