Jackson v. Gordy

United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

Jackson v. Gordy

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION

COREY KHALIL JACKSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 7:24-cv-10-ACA-GMB ) WARDEN GORDY, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION On November 12, 2024, the magistrate judge entered a report recommending the dismissal of this action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. 18). Although the magistrate judge advised Plaintiff Corey Khalil Jackson of his right to file written objections within fourteen days, the court has not received any objections. The court ADOPTS the report with one modification. Mr. Jackson’s allegation that his new dorm had the same problems as his old dorm is not conclusory. However, Mr. Jackson does not allege that Warden Gordy was aware of the problems in the new dorm or that he notified Warden Gordy of those problems after his transfer. (See doc. 1 at 7, 11–12). And a defendant cannot be held liable unless he had “actual knowledge that an inmate faced a substantial risk of serious harm.” Caldwell v. Warden, FCI Talladega,

748 F.3d 1090, 1099

(11th Cir. 2014). Accordingly, Mr. Jackson’s claim against Warden Gordy in his individual capacity fails as a matter of law. The court therefore ACCEPTS the recommendation and WILL DISMISS the complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim. The court will enter a separate final order. DONE and ORDERED this December 5, 2024.

ANNEMARIE CARNEY AXON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown