Braggs v. Hamm

United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama

Braggs v. Hamm

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

EDWARD BRAGGS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. v. ) 2:14cv601-MHT ) (WO) JOHN HAMM, in his ) official capacity as ) Commissioner of ) the Alabama Department of ) Corrections, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

REVISED REMEDY SCHEDULING ORDER ON PHASE 1 ADA CLAIMS AND PHASE 2A EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM

Based on the representations made on the record during the triannual status conference on August 29, 2025, it is ORDERED that the deadlines and dates for the Phases 1 and 2A remedy scheduling order for the ADA and Eighth Amendment claims remain and are revised as set forth below. Note that the formatting of the scheduling order is as follows. Each section is designated with a cell-block number so that it may be more easily referenced. For example, Section III deals with the “PHASE 2A EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM.” Subpart B of that section pertains to “CORRECTIONAL STAFFING.” So, the second cell in that subpart is referred to as cell III.B.2. The court’s citation for this cell is (Doc. X) at 4, cell III.B.2. Cell OLD DATES NEW DATES I. GENERAL I.A The effective date 3/9/2022 of the Phase 2A Omnibus Remedial Order. (Doc. 3464) at § 1.3.

II. PHASE 1 ADA CLAIMS II.A PHASE 1 ADA 1 Phase 1: Deadline 11/1/28 for termination of monitoring. (Doc. 3801). 2 Phase 1: Deadline 11/1/27 for completion of alterations for the second and third phases regarding the removal, remediation, or construction of new facilities. (Doc. 3801). 3 Phase 1: (1) Parties Under submission filed a joint status report regarding their efforts to resolve, with the help of Gina Hilberry, the overarching Phase 1 ADA transition plan issue in light of the construction of one or more new facilities, including an anticipated deadline for the completion of an updated transition plan with any new compliance deadlines. (Doc. 4000). The original January 26, 2024 filing deadline has been extended multiple times. Most recently on January 28, 2025, Defendants requested another extension, which plaintiffs oppose. The issue under submission is whether defendants’ motion for an extension--as well as the previous extension granted by the court--is governed by Rule 60 and Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County,

502 U.S. 367

(1992). (Doc. 4327) or a different legal standard. See March 4, 2025 Order (Doc. 4327).

(2)Based on representations made at the triannual conference on December 5, 2023, the issue of how to proceed on the alterations to Donaldson has been folded into this cell. (Doc. 4105).

III. PHASE 2A EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM III.A MONITORING 1 Status conference: 7/18/25 at 9:00 a.m. 10/10/25 at 9:00 The parties should a.m. be prepared to discuss the status of the EMT. The court will use this status conference to answer any questions needed to try and resolve the outstanding EMT issues by the end of the October. 2 In accordance with Under submission the parties’ proposed schedule, (Doc. 4146), by April 17, 2024, the EMT was to provide the parties with an estimation of time necessary to provide written responses to the parties’ objections. Since then, the court has granted multiple extension requests. The deadline in this order reflects the most recent extension. (Doc. 4214). 3 Parties to jointly Under submission file the EMT’s finalized proposed versions of the performance measures and audit tools. (Doc. 4029). The court has granted multiple extension requests. The deadline in this order reflects the most recent extension. (Doc. 4214). 4 If the plaintiffs Under submission have any unresolved objections to the performance measures/audit tools, the plaintiffs shall file versions of the EMT’s finalized proposed performance measures and audit tools that are redlined line-by- line. (Doc. 4029). The court has granted multiple extension requests. The deadline in this order reflects the most recent extension. (Doc. 4214). 5 If the defendants Under submission have any unresolved objections to the performance measures/audit tools, the defendants shall file versions of the EMT’s finalized proposed performance measures and audit tools that are redlined line-by- line. (Doc. 4029). The court has granted multiple extension requests. The deadline in this order reflects the most recent extension. (Doc. 4214). 6 Parties are to file Under submission their proposal or proposals as to what the court’s resolution procedure should look like concerning disagreements about the performance measures/audit tools, including the issues outlined in the court’s order, (Doc. 4029). The court has granted multiple extension requests. The deadline in this order reflects the most recent extension. (Doc. 4214). 7 Status conference: 11/21/25 at 9:00 a.m. 11/20/25 9:00 The parties should a.m. be prepared to discuss all the matters identified in the preceding cells to the extent they remain outstanding. (Doc. 4029).

III.B CORRECTIONAL STAFFING 1 The defendants must On March 1, June 1, submit correctional September 1, and staffing reports to December 1 of each the court and the year EMT. (Doc. 3464) at § 2.1.6. By agreement of the parties, the defendants are to submit these reports on the dates set forth in the Phase 2A Understaffing Remedial Order (Doc. 1657) at § 4, namely, March 1, June 1, September 1, and December 1 of each year. 2 The parties must Within seven days of submit a joint the filing of each correctional-staffin quarterly g “trends” report to correctional staffing the court within report. seven days of the filing of each quarterly correctional staffing report. The “trends” reports should include the five items outlined in the court’s July 17, 2023, order. (Doc. 3994.) 3 Status conference: 11/21/25 at 9:00 a.m. 11/20/25 9:00 The parties should a.m. be prepared to discuss what the quarterly correctional-staffin g reports reflect, as outlined in their most recent correctional-staffin g trends report. 4 At the triannual Under submission. conference held on December 5, 2023, the court voiced concerns about the looming July 1, 2025, deadline, especially in regard to what to do in the event that it is not met. The court is currently considering how to proactively approach that deadline. The parties submitted separate reports regarding the court’s options for what to do about the deadline. Doc. 2404 and Doc. 4243. The issue under submission is how the court should respond to ADOC’s alleged failure to comply with the July 1, 2025 staffing deadline. 5 The formatting for On hold pending EMT’s the correctional evaluation. staffing reports shall be further revised, if necessary, based on input from the EMT. See Phase 2A Omnibus Remedial Order (Doc. 3464) at § 2.1.6. The parties are to file a joint status report as to the adequacy of the correctional staffing reports, including the EMT’s progress on evaluating the adequacy of the reports and whether the EMT’s performance measures touch on this issue. (Doc. 3994.) 6 The defendants must On hold pending develop with the consideration of Savages, and submit other matters as to the court, indicated. realistic benchmarks for the level of correctional staffing ADOC will attain by December 31 of 2022 (though this date is passed), 2023, and 2024 respectively to put ADOC on track to fill all mandatory and essential posts by July 1, 2025. (Doc. 3464) at § 2.1.5. (Doc. 3857). The defendants filed their proposed benchmarks on January 20, 2023 (Doc. 3901), the plaintiffs filed a response (Doc. 3906), to which defendants replied (Doc. 3917). The State’s proposed benchmarks do not reflect the operative Updated 2022 Correctional Staffing Analysis (Doc. 3928) and they employ a 33% overtime rate, which is a contested issue. Accordingly, the court does not accept the proposed benchmarks at this time and will revisit the issue of benchmarks once other issues pertaining to the quarterly correctional staffing reports, overtime calculation, and updated staffing analyses are resolved. 7 Deadline by which 7/1/2025 ADOC must fill all mandatory and essential posts at the level indicated in the most recent staffing analysis at that time. (Doc. 3464) at § 2.1.4. As stated above, the issue under submission is how the court should respond to ADOC’s alleged failure to comply with the July 1, 2025 staffing deadline.

III.C MENTAL-HEALTH STAFFING 1 The defendants must On March 1, June 1, submit mental-health September 1, and staffing reports to December 1 of each the court and the year EMT. (Doc. 3464) at § 2.2.4. By agreement of the parties, the defendants are to submit these reports on the dates set forth in the Phase 2A Understaffing Remedial Order (Doc. 1657) at § 4, namely, March 1, June 1, September 1, and December 1 of each year. 2 The parties must Within seven days of submit a joint the filing of each mental-health-staffi quarterly ng “trends” report correctional staffing to the court within report. seven days of the filing of each quarterly mental-health-staffi ng report. The “trends” reports should include the five items outlined in the court’s July 19, 2023, order. (Doc. 3998). 3 Status conference: 11/21/25 at 9:00 a.m. 11/20/25 9:00 The parties should a.m. be prepared to discuss what the quarterly mental-health-staffi ng reports reflect, as outlined in their most recent mental-health-staffi ng trends report. 4 There is an ongoing On hold pending EMT’s disagreement on the evaluation. appropriate method for comparison of ADOC’s mental-health staffing levels against the levels set forth by the mental-health staffing ratios and mental-health staffing matrix incorporated in Sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.3 of the Phase 2A Omnibus Remedial Order (Doc. 3464). Plaintiffs filed reports as to this issue (Doc. 3766 & Doc. 3854) and the defendants filed a response to the plaintiffs’ report. (Doc. 3856). In light of these reports, the court ordered the parties to file a joint report specifically identifying their areas of “agreement” and their areas of “disagreement,” and their suggestions of how the court should proceed. The parties filed that report on December 28, 2022. (Doc. 3892). At the triannual status conference on July 14, 2023, the parties agreed that the court should wait to see if the EMT’s performance measures touch on this issue. Nonetheless, the parties are to file a joint status report as to the EMT’s progress on evaluating the quarterly mental- health staffing reports and whether the EMT’s performance measures touch on this issue. 5 The EMT shall review Beginning one year ADOC’s mental-health from the initiation staffing ratios and, of monitoring if necessary, make recommendations for revising them. (Doc. 3464) at § 2.2.2. 6 Deadline by which 7/1/2025 ADOC must achieve the staffing levels set forth in the staffing matrix previously approved by the court in the Phase 2A Order and Injunction on Mental-Health Staffing Remedy (Doc. 2688), subject to any subsequent modifications. Note: The Omnibus Remedial Order originally set June 1, 2025, as the compliance deadline. (Doc. 3464) at § 2.2.3. As reflected in the parties’ July 26, 2023, joint filing (Doc. 4004) at 2–3, that date was reset to July 1, 2025 (Doc. 3486) at 3. As stated above, how the court should respond to the now- passed deadline is on hold pending EMT’s evaluation.

III.D RESTRICTIVE HOUSING 1 The defendants must On a weekly basis file with the court and the EMT reports on each inmate who has been in restrictive housing for longer than 72 hours under exceptional circumstances during that week. (Doc. 3464) at § 3.1.4, (Doc. 3557), and (Doc. 3771). 2 The court required On hold pending EMT’s the parties to file evaluation. reports on what the most recent weekly SMI reports to the court reflect (trends, etc., if any). While the reports raised serious concerns, the court decided at the August 15 and November 7, 2022, status conferences not to take any immediate action, with the understanding that the EMT will examine the concerns closely in the very near future and that, otherwise, the court will reconsider looking into the issue itself (Doc. 3768 and Doc. 3865). At the triannual status conference on July 14, 2023, the parties agreed that the court should wait to see if the EMT’s performance measures touch on this issue. The parties are to file a joint status report as to the EMT’s progress on reviewing the SMI reports and whether the EMT’s performance measures touch on this issue. 3 On October 27, 2023, | By 5:00 p.m. on the the parties filed a 15t* day of the month joint statement following the outlining the conclusion of the defendants’ proposal | reporting month. as to how ADOC will allow its restrictive housing 13

units (RHUs) to function safely with the correctional staff that ADOC currently employs. (Doc. 4061). The court informally approved this plan and, as proposed by the parties, ordered ongoing monthly status reports regarding restrictive housing operations. The defendants are to file monthly RHU reports as outlined in Doc. 4082. 4 Parties are to file Within seven days of RHU “trends” report, the filing of each as outlined in Doc. monthly restrictive 4082. housing report. 5 Status conference: 11/21/25 at 9:00 a.m. 11/20/25 9:00 The parties should a.m. be prepared to discuss the matter in the preceding cell. 6 The Phase 2A omnibus On hold pending EMT’s remedial order evaluation. provided that all RHU cells must be cleaned by June 8, 2022. (Doc. 3464) at § 3.1.1. The defendants filed a notice with the court confirming that they have met this deadline. (Doc. 3698). Based on the representations made at several status conferences, the court stated that it will not take any immediate action with respect to the continued cleanliness of RHU cells, albeit with the expectation that the EMT will monitor the issue as soon as it is fully operational. The court stated that it would revisit the issue later in light of the status of the EMT at that time. (Doc. 3770 and Doc. 3862). At the triannual status conference on July 14, 2023, the parties agreed that the court should wait to see if the EMT’s performance measures touch on this issue. The parties are to file a joint status report as to the EMT’s progress on the continued cleanliness of RHU cells and whether the EMT’s performance measures touch on this issue. 7 Deadline by which Stayed all RHU cells must comply with the conditions set forth in Lindsay M. Hayes’s Checklist for the “Suicide-Resistant” Design of Correctional Facilities (Doc. 3206-5). (Doc. 3464) at § 3.1.3. Stayed pursuant to opinion and order on motion to stay. (Doc. 3526) at 75-76. III.E SUICIDE PREVENTION 1 ADOC must conduct Stayed as to RHU inspections of all cells only; suicide watch, SU, otherwise, on a and RHU cells to quarterly basis verify that they meet the conditions set forth Lindsay M. Hayes’s Checklist for the “Suicide-Resistant” Design of Correctional Facilities (Doc. 3206-5). (Doc. 3464) at § 2.1.7.2. Stayed as to RHU cells pursuant to opinion and order on motion to stay. (Doc. 3526) at 75-76.

III.F HIGHER LEVELS OF CARE 1 In collaboration On hold pending EMT’s with the EMT, ADOC evaluation. must reassess, on an annual basis, (1) the number of inmates on its mental-health caseload and (2) whether the current estimate of the percentage of the mental-health caseload requiring inpatient treatment is accurate. (Doc. 3464) at § 11.2.2. The parties submitted joint reports on how to proceed on this issue on January 27, 2023 (Doc. 3905) and February 9, 2023 (Doc. 3918). At the triannual status conference on July 14, 2023, the parties agreed that the court should wait to see if the EMT’s performance measures touch on this issue. The parties are to file a joint status report as to the EMT’s progress as to assessing the mental-health caseload and whether the EMT’s performance measures touch on this issue.

IV. MISCELLANEOUS IV.A STATUS CONFERENCES 1 Triannual status 11/21/25 at 9:00 a.m. 11/20/25 9:00 conference, with the a.m. parties to submit reports 10 business days before the status conference (Doc. 3467 and Doc. 3480). 2 Triannual status 2/20/26 at 9:00 a.m. 2/19/26 at 9:00 conference, with the a.m. parties to submit reports 10 business days before the status conference (Doc. 3467 and Doc. 3480). 3 Triannual status 7/10/26 at 9:00 a.m. 7/9/26 at 9:00 conference, with the a.m. parties to submit reports 10 business days before the status conference (Doc. 3467 and Doc. 3480). 4 Triannual status 11/13/26 at 9:00 a.m. 11/12/26 at 9:00 conference, with the a.m. parties to submit reports 10 business days before the status conference (Doc. 3467 and Doc. 3480). 5 Triannual status 2/5/27 at 9:00 a.m. 2/4/27 at 9:00 conference, with the a.m. parties to submit reports 10 business days before the status conference (Doc. 3467 and Doc. 3480). 6 Triannual status 7/9/27 at 9:00 a.m. 7/8/27 at 9:00 conference, with the a.m. parties to submit reports 10 business days before the status conference (Doc. 3467 and Doc. 3480). 7 Triannual status 11/5/27 at 9:00 a.m. 11/4/27 at 9:00 conference, with the a.m. parties to submit reports 10 business days before the status conference (Doc. 3467 and Doc. 3480). 8 Triannual status 2/4/28 at 9:00 a.m. 2/3/28 at 9:00 conference, with the a.m. parties to submit reports 10 business days before the status conference (Doc. 3467 and Doc. 3480). 9 On July 24, 2025 On hold pending Jospeh Renney moved defendants’ to intervene to discussions with unseal certain Renney. documents related to summary judgment briefing and class certification for use in his own lawsuit. At the August 29, 2025 status conference defendants stated they were trying to figure out if they could provide Renney with what he needs without him having to intervene. If so, the intervenor will file a notice to withdraw the motion. If not, defendants will respond to the motion. This matter is before Magistrate Judge Ott for monitoring and possible mediation.

IV.B STANDING ORDERS FOR HEARINGS AND STATUS CONFERENCES 1 All hearings and evidentiary hearings shall be in accordance with the order entered on 1/15/2020 (Doc. 2727), unless otherwise specified. 2 All hearings, evidentiary hearings, and status conferences are to be by videoconferencing unless otherwise specified. 3 Any hearing on objections to the performance measures and audit tools will be held virtually and made available to the public as outlined in Doc. 4104. DONE, this the 24th day of September, 2025. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown