DANA DENNIS v. JEANIE C. JONES, et al.

United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

DANA DENNIS v. JEANIE C. JONES, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION

DANA DENNIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) Case No.: 4:24-cv-1303-LCB-JHE ) JEANIE C. JONES, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

ORDER On October 22, 2025, U.S. Magistrate Judge John H. England, III, issued a Report and Recommendation in accordance with

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) recommending that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Doc. 33). No party has objected to the Report and Recommendation. If a party objects to a portion of a Magistrate Judge’s report or proposed findings or recommendations, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which the party has specifically objected.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). Unchallenged portions of a Magistrate Judge’s report are reviewed for clear error. Haywood v. Green, Case No. 1:21-cv-01112-LCB-HNJ,

2023 WL 6303027

, at *1 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 27, 2023). The district court may, in its review, “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,” the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C). Having reviewed the proposed findings and recommendations for clear error, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) should be ACCEPTED and hereby ADOPTS it as the findings of the Court. The case is therefore DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the case. DONE and ORDERED this December 16, 20235.

LILES C. BURKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown