United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, 2026

Kelia McCleary-Broadnax v. Selene Finance, LP, et al.

Kelia McCleary-Broadnax v. Selene Finance, LP, et al.
United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama · Decided April 17, 2026
Kelia McCleary-Broadnax v. Selene Finance, LP, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION KELIA MCCLEARY-BROADNAX, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIV. ACT. NO. 1:25-cv-348-TFM-MU ) SELENE FINANCE, LP, et al., ) ) Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On September 25, 2025, Plaintiff Kelia McCleary-Broadnax filed an application for entry of default judgment against Defendant U.S. Bank N.A., as Trustee for SASCO Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-RNP1 (“U.S. Bank”), asserting that U.S. Bank had failed to plead or otherwise defend this action. Doc. 11. On October 15, 2025, the Clerk declined to enter default because U.S. Bank had filed a motion to dismiss on September 27, 2025. See Doc. 20.1 Concurrent with its motion to dismiss, U.S. Bank requested leave to file its motion to dismiss out of time, and this request was granted on September 29, 2026. See Docs. 14, 15. Accordingly, U.S. Bank’s motion to dismiss was deemed timely filed. Moreover, determining cases on their merits is preferred over default judgments. See, e.g., Fla. Physician’s Ins. Co., Inc. v. Ehlers, 8 F.3d 780, 783 (11th Cir. 1993) (citations omitted) (“We note that defaults are seen with disfavor because of the strong policy of determining cases on their merits.”); Perez v. Wells Fargo N.A., 774 F.3d 1329, 1332 (11th Cir. 2014) (“we have a strong preference for deciding cases on the merits—not based on a single missed The clerk’s notice correctly noted that U.S. Bank filed a motion to dismiss on September 27, 2025, but it incorrectly referenced Doc. 7, which is the motion to dismiss filed by DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. and Selene Finance, LP on September 16, 2025, rather than Doc. 12, which is the relevant motion to dismiss filed by U.S. Bank. deadline—whenever reasonably possible.”); Wahl v. McIver, 773 F.2d 1169, 1174 (11th Cir. 1985) (“[W]e must respect the usual preference that cases be heard on the merits rather than resorting to sanctions that deprive a litigant of his day in court.”).

Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 18) is DENIED. This case is REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

DONE and ORDERED this the 17th day of April, 2026. s/ Terry F. Moorer_ TERRY F. MOORER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.