David Lee Pair, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION DAVID LEE PAIR, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 1:25-cv-2223-LCB-SGC ) FEDERAL BUREAU OF ) PRISONS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER On April 29, 2026, U.S. Magistrate Judge Staci G. Cornelius issued a Report and Recommendation in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) recommending that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Doc. 9). No party has objected to the Report and Recommendation.
If a party objects to a portion of a Magistrate Judge’s report or proposed findings or recommendations, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which the party has specifically objected. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). Unchallenged portions of a Magistrate Judge’s report are reviewed for clear error. Haywood v. Green, 695 F. Supp. 3d 1315, 1318 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 27, 2023). The district court may, in its review, “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,” the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Having reviewed the proposed findings and recommendations for clear error, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 9) should be ACCEPTED and hereby ADOPTS it as the findings of the Court.
The case is therefore DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close the case.
DONE and ORDERED this June 1, 2026.
LILES C. BURKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.