United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, 2026

Akeem James Millender v. Kenneth Butler

Akeem James Millender v. Kenneth Butler
United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama · Decided June 4, 2026
Akeem James Millender v. Kenneth Butler

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION AKEEM JAMES MILLENDER, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 1:25-cv-1898-HDM-NAD KENNETH BUTLER, Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Akeem James Millender, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on November 3, 2025, by filing a standardized, preprinted form. (Doc. 1). On February 9, 2026, the magistrate judge ordered Millender to file an amended complaint to cure various deficiencies in the original pleading on or before March 11, 2026. (Doc. 8). The magistrate judge explicitly informed Millender that failure to comply with the order “may result in the dismissal of this action.” Id. at 4 (emphasis omitted). Millender neither amended his complaint in compliance with the magistrate judge’s order nor sought an extension of time to do so.

On March 24, 2026, the magistrate judge entered a report recommending the court dismiss this case without prejudice based on Millender’s failure to prosecute his claims. (Doc. 9). The magistrate judge advised Millender of his right to file specific written objections within fourteen days. Id. at 2. The Clerk of Court mailed the report to Millender’s address of record, but the fourteen-day deadline expired without the court receiving any objections.

After the deadline for objections passed, the report was returned to the Clerk of Court as undeliverable because Millender is “not in this facility,” (doc. 10), despite the court’s clear warning that his “claims may be dismissed if [he does] not keep the court advised of [his] current mailing address,” (doc. 3). This court has long recognized that a pro se inmate’s failure to update his address when ordered to do so, rendering him essentially beyond the court’s ability to contact, constitutes a failure to prosecute, see, e.g., Payne v. Burns, No. 4:24-cv-103, 2024 WL 3264481, at *1 (N.D. Ala. July 1, 2024), which only compounds Millender’s earlier failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s order to amend his complaint.

Having carefully reviewed and considered the record of this case, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s report and ACCEPTS the recommendation.

Accordingly this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. The court will enter a separate final order. For information regarding the cost of appeal, see the attached notice.

DONE and ORDERED on June 4, 2026.

(AO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States Court of Appeals Eleventh Circuit Forsyth Street, N.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303 David J. Smith In Replying Give Number Clerk of Court of Case and Names of Parties

NOTICE TO PRISONERS CONCERNING CIVIL APPEALS

The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 REQUIRES that all prisoners pay the Court’s $600.00 docket fee plus $5.00 filing fee (for a total of $605.00) when appealing any civil judgment.

If you wish to appeal in a civil case that Act requires that upon filing a notice of appeal you either: (1) Pay the total $605.00 fee to the clerk of the district court from which this case arose; or (2) arrange to have a prison official certify to the district court from which the appeal arose the average monthly deposits and balances in your prison account for each of the six months preceding the filing of a notice of appeal.

If you proceed with option (2) above, the Act requires that the district court order you to pay an initial partial fee of at least 20% of the greater of either the average monthly deposits or of the average monthly balances shown in your prison account. The remainder of the total $605.00 fee will thereafter be deducted from your prison account each month that your account balance exceeds $10.00. Each such monthly deduction shall equal 20% of all deposits to your prison account during the previous month, until the total $605.00 fee is paid. (If your prison account statement shows that you cannot pay even the required initial partial fee, your appeal may nevertheless proceed, BUT THE TOTAL $605.00 FEE WILL BE ASSESSED AGAINST AND WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM FUTURE DEPOSITS TO YOUR PRISON ACCOUNT.)

Fees are not refundable, regardless of outcome, and deductions from your prison account will continue until the total $605.00 fee is collected, even if an appeal is unsuccessful.

David J. Smith Clerk of Court

PLRA Notice

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.