United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, 2026

Prisiliana Jaimes Nunez v. Warden, FCI Aliceville

Prisiliana Jaimes Nunez v. Warden, FCI Aliceville
United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama · Decided June 8, 2026
Prisiliana Jaimes Nunez v. Warden, FCI Aliceville

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION PRISILIANA JAIMES NUNEZ, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 7:25-cv-1765-LCB-HNJ ) WARDEN, FCI Aliceville, ) ) Respondent. ) ORDER On May 12, 2026, U.S. Magistrate Judge Herman N. Johnson, Jr., issued a Report and Recommendation in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) recommending that the Court deny Nunez’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition because she is ineligible for application of First Step Act credits to her sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(E)(i). (Doc. 14). No party has objected to the Report and Recommendation.

If a party objects to a portion of a Magistrate Judge’s report or proposed findings or recommendations, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which the party has specifically objected. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). Unchallenged portions of a Magistrate Judge’s report are reviewed for clear error. Haywood v. Green, 695 F. Supp. 3d 1315, 1318 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 27, 2023). The district court may, in its review, “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,” the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Having reviewed the proposed findings and recommendations for clear error, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 14) should be ACCEPTED and hereby ADOPTS it as the findings of the Court. Nunez’s § 2241 petition (doc. 13) is DENIED. The final judgment will be entered separately.

DONE and ORDERED this June 8, 2026.

LILES C. BURKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.