Malone v. Donnally
Malone v. Donnally
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the Court.
It is assigned as Error that the declaration is both in debt assumpsit. The declaration sets out that defendant made his certain note in writing, sealed with his seal, &c., whereby he promised to pay. The contract is substantially, though
The defendant plead payment, “ and of this he puts him- “ self upon the country,” and the plaintiff doth “ the like.” It is contended that nothing was put in issue. The defendant alledges that the debt has been paid, and puts himself upon the country for trial of that fact. It is submitted to the Jury to determine on its truth or falsehood. It is true the plea concludes improperly, and this matter might have been taken advantage of by demurrer; but it would be strange doctrine to admit the defendant to take advantage of the informality of his own plea after a verdict had been rendered against him on it.
It is further assigned as Error—That judgment was rendered for damages when no-damages were claimed by the declaration, and that the verdict and judgment vary from the allegations in the declaration.
The damages are left blank in the declaration ; but damages to an amount sufficient to cover the amount found by the Jury are laid in the writ, which, for the purposes of amendment, is part of the record and proceedings,
JLet the judgment be affirmed.
1 Com. D. 331. 5 Com. Dig. 9. p. 1.
St. of Jeofails. 1807. Laws Ala. 454, Sect. 36.
2 Wash. 203. 3 Hen. & Munford, 457. 2 Tidd. P. 826.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Malone against Donnally
- Status
- Published