Supreme Court of Alabama, 1823

Waters v. Creagh

Waters v. Creagh
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided December 15, 1823 · Saffold
1 Minor 128

Waters v. Creagh

Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court delivered by

Judge Saffold.

When there are several executors, some of whom die before the administration is completed, the interest devolves exclusively on the last survivor and his executors, if any. Toller, 44. But it is said, that the note being payable to Creagh and Bayard, they had a right, in their individual-characters, to bring an action on it. Admitting that the payees had a discretion to sue, either in their private or representative capacity, yet after the death of one, the action must be by the survivor alone, and the executor or administrator of the deceased cannot be joined, but must seek his *129remedy against the survivor, for the share of the deceased. 1st Chitty’s Pleadings, 10; and see 3d. Munford, 513. 1st Wash. 257.

It is therefore evident, that whether the debt be received as due to the payees in their private or representative characters, the action should have been in the name of the survivor alone.

It is the unanimous opinion of the Court that the judgment be reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.