Supreme Court of Alabama, 1823

Rapier v. Holland

Rapier v. Holland
Supreme Court of Alabama · Decided December 15, 1823 · Lipscomb
1 Minor 176

Rapier v. Holland

Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice Lipscomb

delivered the opinion of the Court.

If we were to admit that the special replication of the *177plaintiff was bad, we should be bound to look back to the first Error of the party demurring : there can be no doubt but that the defendants’ plea of set-off was bad, and would have been so held on general demurrer. In an action on a promise made to an administrator, a debt due from his intestate cannot be set off: the demands are in different rights : to set off the last against the first might do injustice to the rights of other creditors, and with our Statutes as to insolvent estates, &c.(a) would tend to involve estates in endless confusion.

Coalter, for plaintiff in Error. Martin, for defendant in Error.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

see Laws Ala. p. 329.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.