Johnson v. Hughes
Johnson v. Hughes
Opinion of the Court
delivered the opinion of the 'Court.
Iv the construction of a statute limiting the time for instituting a prosecution for a-fine or forfeiture, the words prosecution or prosecuted, will apply to any proceeding for the recovery of the fine or forfeiture, to an action of debt as well as to a prosecution by indictment.
The forty-ninth section of the statute of 1807, is general and prospective in its operation, and applies not only to penalties and forfeitures to be incurred under laws then in being, but also to forfeitures arising under laws thereafter to be passed. In the present case, the reason for this construction is stronger, because the action for special damages is expressly reserved by the statute of 1810.
Judgement affirmed.
2 Cranch 340. Adams' qui tam ws. Woods.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- W. Johnson v. A. and J. E. Hughes
- Status
- Published