Switzer v. Guardians of Holloway
Switzer v. Guardians of Holloway
Opinion of the Court
This is an action of detinue, brought by the defendant in this Court, by his guardians, for a negro.— The declaration is in the common form; but no pro-fert is made of the letters of guardianship. The defendant below, pleaded,
1. “ Non detinet” — to which there was issue.
2. “ Purchased of Billy Holloway,” — to which there is a replication, that the vendor was of unsound mind, and incapable of contracting away his property ; and that guardians had been appointed, and that they governed him and his effects. To this there is a general replication in short, and issue, and a verdict was had for the plaintiffs, for four hundred and fifty dollars.
1. That there -were no such issues formed as would enable the jury to try the cause; and,
2. That the declaration is insufficient; there being no profert of the letters of guardianship. .
The pleadings were, by consent, taken in short.
The first plea of non detinet, is a proper and issuable plea, and will sustain the verdict; and the want óf the profert of letters of guardianship, is cured by the verdict. It could only be taken advantage of by demurrer.
The judgment must be affirmed.
1 Chitty’s Pl. 402.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- SWITZER versus GUARDIANS OF HOLLOWAY
- Status
- Published